Hillary, Bill is moving as permitted to do so by law in regard to usage of religious procedure.
The law does protect this even as it protects the WT by granting it ecclesiastical privelege to disfellowship people.
After he has done what he has done and gotten response he can speak up louder and more clearly with the same shield of ECCLESIASTICAL PRIVELEGE.
This is legal. All the moves will have been gone through.
Now if you want to doubt it, fine, but keep your eyes open.
Bill has stated as fact that five GB members are alleged to be molestors. He knows who the women are who have said so. I do have absolute confidence in this. Pat Garza is not the only one.
I also have confidence that Bill's attorney consultants have said this is the way to do it. Using the "ecclesiastical privelege" that the WTS has used back on them.
Fire with fire. Fire to fire. Hang evildoers with their own rope.
Bill is a true Free Christian fighter!
So if I were Ted Jarasc's attorneys I would not be too quick to laugh at all.
My guess, Hillery, is you do not understand why Bill is doing what he is doing because you must be outside the U.S. where church-government separation by constitution is not quite the same. Believe it, he "does" have a plan. It's clear from here if not from there.
Edited by - nancee park on 4 October 2002 16:30:31